Australia
In Australia,
many states have enacted legislation outlawing cruelty to animals, however, it
is argued that welfare laws do not adequately extend to production
animals. Whilst police maintain an overall jurisdiction in prosecution of
criminal matters, in many states officers of the RSPCA and other animal welfare
charities are accorded authority to investigate and prosecute animal cruelty
offenses.
Asia
India
The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act,1960
was amended in the year 1982.[2] According to the newly amended Indian animal
welfare act,2011 cruelty to animals is an offence and is punishable with a fine
which shall not be less than ten thousand Rupees,which may extend to twenty
five thousand Rupees or with imprisonment up to two years or both in the case
of a first offence.In the case of second or subsequent offence,with a fine
which shall not be less than fifty thousand Rupees, but may extend to one lakh
Rupees and with imprisonment with a term which shall not be less than one year
but may extend to three years.
Japan
In Japan,
the 1973 Welfare and Management of Animals Act (amended in 1999 and 2005)[4]
stipulates that "no person shall kill, injure, or inflict cruelty to
animals without due course", and in particular, criminalises cruelty to all
mammals, birds, and reptiles possessed by persons; as well as cattle, horses,
goats, sheep, pigs, dogs, cats, pigeons, domestic rabbits, chickens, and
domestic ducks regardless of whether they are in captivity.
Killing or injuring without due reason: up to
one year's imprisonment with labour or a fine of up to one million yen
Animal
experiments are regulated by the 2000 Law for the Humane Treatment and
Management of Animals, which was amended in 2006.This law requires those
using animals to follow the principles outlined in the 3Rs and use as few
animals as possible, and cause minimal distress and suffering. Regulation is at
a local level based on national guidelines, but there are no governmental
inspections of institutions and no reporting requirement for the numbers of
animals used.
China
As of 2006 there were no laws in China governing
acts of cruelty to animals.[7] In certain jurisdictions such as Fuzhou, dog
control officers may kill any unaccompanied dogs on sight. However, the
People's Republic of China is currently in the process of making changes to its
stray-dog population laws in the capital city, Beijing. Mr. Zheng Gang who is
the director of the Internal and Judicial Committee which comes under the
Beijing Municipal People's Congress (BMPC), supports the new draft of the
Beijing Municipal Regulation on Dogs from the local government. This new law is
due to replace the current Beijing Municipal Regulation on Dog Ownership,
introduced in 1889. The current regulation talks of "strictly"
limiting dog ownership and controlling the number of dogs in the city. The new
draft focuses instead on "strict management and combining restrictions
with management."[8] There are no government supported charitable
organizations like the RSPCA, which monitors the cases on animal cruelty, so
that all kinds of animal abuses, such as to fish, tigers, and bears, are to be
reported for law enforcement and animal welfare.
Europe
Germany, Switzerland, Sweden, and Austria have all banned battery cages for egg-laying hens. The entire European Union is phasing out battery cages by 2012.[24] It is also illegal in many parts of Europe to declaw a cat.
Germany
In Germany,
killing animals or causing significant pain (or prolonged or repeated pain) to
them is punishable by imprisonment of up to three years or a financial
penalty.[26] If the animal is of foreign origin, the act may also be punishable
as criminal damage.[27]
Italy
Acts of
cruelty against animals can be punished with imprisonment, for a minimum of
three months up to a maximum of three years, and with a fine ranging from a
minimum of 3.000,00 Euro to a maximum of 160.000,00 Euro, as for the law
n°189/2004.[28] The law was passed mainly to crush the phenomenon of dog
fighting, which in Italy is a clandestine blood sport fully controlled by
organized crime.
Americas
Mexico
In Mexico, there are little to no animal
cruelty laws, however, it has been suggested that animal cruelty laws are
slowly being implemented. The country's current policy usually condemns
physical harm to animals as property damage to the owners of the abused animal.
The Law of Animal Protection of the Federal District is wide-ranging, based on
banning 'unnecessary suffering'. Similar laws now exist in most states.
However, this is disregarded by much of the public and authorities.
United States
The primary
federal law relating to animal care and conditions in the US is the Animal
Welfare Act of 1966, amended in 1970, 1976, 1985, 1990, 2002 and 2007. It is
the only Federal law in the United States that regulates the treatment of
animals in research, exhibition, transport, and by dealers. Other laws,
policies, and guidelines may include additional species coverage or
specifications for animal care and use, but all refer to the Animal Welfare Act
as the minimum acceptable standard.
The AWA has
been criticized by animal rights groups for excluding birds, rats and mice bred
for research, and animals raised for food or fiber as well as all cold-blooded
animals.
The Animal
Legal Defense Fund releases an annual report ranking the animal protection laws
of every state based on their relative strength and general comprehensiveness.
In 2010's report, the top five states for their strong anti-cruelty laws were
Illinois, Maine, Michigan, Oregon, and California. The five states with the
weakest animal cruelty laws were Kentucky, North Dakota, Idaho, Mississippi,
and Iowa.
In
Massachusetts and New York, agents of humane societies and associations may be
appointed as special officers to enforce statutes outlawing animal cruelty.
In 2004, a
Florida legislator proposed a ban on "cruelty to bovines," stating:
"A person who, for the purpose of practice, entertainment, or sport,
intentionally fells, trips, or otherwise causes a cow to fall or lose its
balance by means of roping, lassoing, dragging, or otherwise touching the tail
of the cow commits a misdemeanor of the first degree."[44] The proposal
did not become law.
0 comments:
Post a Comment